Please stop it, Rafidah tells Mahathir
Curry Favor - Please stop it, Rafidah tells Mahathir
Datuk Seri Rafidah Aziz has made an impassioned plea to Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad to stop his personal attack on the Government and to work with the present administration to bring the country to a new level of development.
“I’m sure it is his personal wish to see this country achieve the objectives of Vision 2020 in good time,” she said.
“And if Tun goes on like this, it will hamper this process.
“If Tun really loves the country and really wants to see the national agenda, the agenda of the Malays and the agenda of the multi-racial society of Malaysia realised in 2020, then he should help us,” she said.
She made the plea after opening Infineon Technologies (Kulim) Sdn Bhd at Kulim Hi-Tech Park here yesterday.
The International Trade and Industry Minister said it would be better for Dr Mahathir to work with the Government and help it achieve Vision 2020.
“The less he talks the better, because some of (his allegations) are going to open a lot of unnecessary things which might even go back to his time (as prime minister),” she said.
Another curry favor : Dr M’s allegation is insulting, says Nazri
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad insulted and questioned the integrity of Kubang Pasu Umno members when he claimed they had accepted bribes in order not to elect him as a delegate to the party’s general assembly.
Umno supreme council member Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz said he doubted the division members, who held their meeting last Saturday, would “stoop so low as to accept a RM200 bribe just to ensure Dr Mahathir would not get elected.”
He was confident that Kubang Pasu Umno division members had made their decision according to their own wishes and were not dictated to or pressured by others.
“This allegation is an insult to Kubang Pasu Umno members. I don’t think it’s right. If it is true, then make a report,” he said after closing a national level pre-university oratory contest organised by the Anti-Corruption Agency yesterday.
Nazri said Dr Mahathir should just accept the fact that he had lost in his bid to become a delegate.
Kubang Pasu Umno division chief Datuk Johari Baharom said members would not simply vote out Dr Mahathir for RM200.
“It’s the first time I’ve heard about money being distributed,” said Johari, who was asked to comment on Dr Mahathir’s claim.
“We are not that 'cheap' to accept such an amount, if anything Dr Mahathir said is to be believed. However, I’m happy that Dr Mahathir has accepted his defeat.
“My division and I will always support him. He’s been with it for more than 30 years,” said Johari.
Umno Youth chief Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein said Dr Mahathir should lodge a complaint with the party’s disciplinary committee.
He also added that if money politics had actually taken place in the Kubang Pasu division, Dr Mahathir’s son Mukhriz would not have been selected as a delegate.
Rakyat mula meratib kegagalan dan kelemahan Abdullah Ahmad Badawi
Sekumpulan penggerak internet yang menggelarkan diri mereka sebagai kickdefella.blogspot.com dan dan undurlah.blogspot.com menyelar Perdana Menteri dan Presiden Umno, Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi dan menyifatkan beliau sebagai pemimpin yang gagal.
Dalam laporan yang disiarkan menerusi laman umno-reform.com kumpulan tersebut menyenaraikan beberapa insiden termasuk janji-janji yang tidak dapat ditunaikan selepas Abdullah mengambil alih kepimpinan negara dan parti daripada Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.
Sebelum ini Mahathir secara mendakwa Abdullah membawa kepimpinan kerajaan dan parti ke arah diktator kerana menghalangnya bercakap kepada ahli Umno dan mengarahkan ahli Majlis Tertinggi termasuk Menteri menghentamnya secara terbuka.
Malah bekas PM itu turut digelar iblis dan beruk serta pemecahbelah parti kerana terus mengkritik peribadi dan kepimpinan Abdullah.
Sehingga dalam sidang akhbarnya Isnin lalu, Mahathir secara terbuka mengesa Abdullah meletakkan jawatan dan mendakwa pengantinya itu mempunyai sifat 'habit of lying'.
Antara kegagalan dan kelemahan Abdullah yang disenaraikan oleh sekumpulan penggerak internet antaranya adalah:-
1. Beliau telah gagal mengotakan janjinya yang dibuat di dalam manifesto pilihanraya 2004.
2. Beliau telah gagal mengotakan janjinya yang dibuat setelah di lantik selaku Perdana Menteri untuk membersihkan Malaysia dari gejala rasuah.
3. Beliau telah gagal menjalankan usul Suruhanjaya DiRaja berhubung penubuhan IPCMC.
4. Beliau telah gagal mempertahankan maruah negara Malaysia di dalam hubungan diplomatik.
5. Beliau telah gagal mempertahankan kedaulatan Malaysia di dalam perjanjian-perjanjian perdagangan dua hala.
6. Beliau telah gagal mempertahankan nama baik Y.Bhg Tun Dr. Mahathir, seorang negarawan ulung yang telah begitu besar jasanya kepada negara daripada di keji dan dihina.
7. Beliau telah gagal mengambil tindakan terhadap menantunya yang mengusulkan bahawa Y.Bhg Tun Dr. Mahathir adalah Beruk.
8. Beliau telah gagal mengambil tindakan terhadap menteri-menteri kabinet beliau yang bersikap kurang ajar terhadap Y. Bhg. Tun Dr. Mahathir.
9. Beliau sendiri telah menghina Y.Bhg. Tun Dr. Mahathir dengan mengusulkan bahawa Tun Dr. Mahathir ibarat Iblis.
10. Beliau telah gagal menjamin kebebasan bersuara yang diperuntukan oleh perlembagaan mengakibatkan Tun Dr. Mahathir merasakan dirinya lebih hina dari mana-mana pacar Tuanku (Raja) yang terhina.
11. Beliau telah secara terbuka menipu rakyat Malaysia dengan membuat kenyataan-kenyataan yang bercanggah dengan kebenaran hakiki.
12. Beliau telah menipu rakyat Malaysia dengan tujuan mempertahankan anaknya sendiri.
A Malaysian “Mexican Stand-Off”
Malaysian-born Bakri Musa wrote :
The present tiff between former Prime Minister Tun Mahathir and his successor could have only three possible outcomes. One or the other could prevail, or the controversy could result in what we in California would call a “Mexican standoff.” This third ending is unlikely considering the personalities of the protagonists. Nonetheless it would be illuminating to speculate what would be the possible consequences of each ending.
Mahathir’s Victory
Consider first if Mahathir were to prevail. The direct impact would be felt not only by Abdullah but also his ministers and senior UMNO leaders, especially those like Rafidah Aziz, Najib Razak, and Nazri Aziz who owe their rise to Mahathir but who are now consumed with vilifying the man in their own uniquely vulgar style. Rafidah especially, for she was the matron, the so-called “iron lady,” who cried uncontrobaly on stage when Mahathir unexpectedly announced his resignation not too long ago.
The consequence to Abdullah would be obvious. He would be an ineffective “lame duck” leader. Many would argue that would make him no different than what he is already now. Well, even the lame could be mortally wounded, and Mahathir’s victory would do that to Abdullah. He would be out, whether voluntarily or through open challenge. Either way it would not be pretty.
UMNO is a big party with a long and distinguished tradition, its recent soiling with money politics and crony capitalism notwithstanding. The fate of any individual regardless of how important never meant much to the party. UMNO successfully withstood the abrupt resignation of its founder leader Datuk Onn and the forced withdrawal of Tunku and Hussein Onn as Prime Ministers and thus UMNO leaders. In the 1980s, it held up to the combined assault of its former leaders Hussein, Tunku, and Tengku Razaleigh. Hussein and Tunku died without ever returning to the fold; Razaleigh saw the wisdom of repenting.
If UMNO could withstand the downfall of those giants, it could easily brush off the stumbling of a dwarf.
Under normal circumstances, if Abdullah were to lose, those ministers who currently are his fervent supporters through their vociferous vilifying of Mahathir would also have to leave. This however, is Malaysia, and those ministers have not exactly demonstrated any class act; hence their chances of doing so would be nil. Watch instead for them to grovel themselves anew to his successor in order to retain their positions. They would, without skipping a beat, be demonizing Abdullah, just as they did to Mahathir. Such are their true being.
If Abdullah’s successor were to retain these characters, it would be a clear indication that he or she lacks something between the ears, much less political sense.
Mahathir Not Prevailing
Mahathir’s not prevailing does not mean an automatic victory for Abdullah. A strong leader becomes stronger upon surviving a challenge; a weak leader continues to be so, and become even more vulnerable. Abdullah would be battered, and a battered lame leader is an easy prey for other would-be leaders, ambitious or otherwise. The world of politics is no different from the world of animals.
Even if Abdullah were to perceive his bout with Mahathir as a momentous victory, that would not necessarily invigorate Abdullah. He would continue to be asleep at meetings, defer tough decisions, and continually plead, “I do not know!”
That sucking hissing sound emanating from Abdullah is not an expression of victory or satisfaction, but a giant sigh of relief at having survived a close call.
As for Mahathir, nothing would have changed for him. Contrary to the “touching” concerns about his dignity by the likes of Rafidah, the Tun would continue conducting himself as he always has, by being direct and frontal. He would become an even more trenchant critic of the Abdullah Administration. He would stay put as advisor to Proton and Petronas, daring Abdullah to remove him.
The media, local and foreign, would continue to attend his press conferences not because he is controversial but because he has something sensible to say and able to articulate it well. Not being elected a delegate would not faze him; UMNO had treated him worse before.
Yes, Mahathir is now much older, but the God Lord has been kind to him; he looks fit. Put Mahathir and Abdullah side by side, and a foreigner would have a hard time telling who succeeded whom!
It is not for the likes of Nazri, Rafidah and other water boys and girls to ascertain Mahathir’s legacy; that is for historians. There will be plenty of time for that.
Abdullah is not without his stubborn streak. If he persists, he risks distracting the nation, and at a time when it could least afford it, what with the Ninth Malaysia Plan barely rolling off.
If Abdullah were to expose his vindictive side and do an “Anwar” on Mahathir on a scale much uglier than the earlier pepper spray episode in Kota Baru, as for example by using the Internal Security Act, that could easily backfire. Besides how would that square with the “Mr. Nice Guy” image he is carefully cultivating, not to mention the Islam Hadhari spirit.
No Joy for Non-Malays (and Malays)
Contrary to the chauvinistic chanting of opportunistic leaders in UMNO ready to exploit any crisis to their own political advantage, there is no particular joy for non-Malays (or even Malays for that matter) to this internal leadership imbroglio. Far from giving non-Malays and the opposition an opportunity to manipulate, as proclaimed by the still green Deputy UMNO Youth leader, they have much to lose with this destructive distraction. Investors local and foreign would not take kindly to any perceived leadership uncertainty. A “Mexican standoff” would do that.
Such insulting assumptions younger UMNO leaders have of their non-Malay fellow citizens reflect the shallowness of their thinking, which in turn is indicative of their thin intellect, despite their having attended august learning institutions.
Resolving this crisis between Mahathir and Abdullah does not mean a simplistic “kiss and make up” meeting between the two, as many UMNO simpletons are urging them to do. It would require addressing the fundamental question of leadership, or lack of one, on the part of Abdullah.
For Abdullah, the central question is (to rephrase Reagan’s famous campaign spiel): Are Malaysians better off under his administration then they were under Mahathir’s. Abdullah has yet to address, let alone answer that plaintive query.
Malaysia Ahmad Badawi Mahathir Khairy MCA UMNO Rafidah Aziz Nazri Aziz
Datuk Seri Rafidah Aziz has made an impassioned plea to Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad to stop his personal attack on the Government and to work with the present administration to bring the country to a new level of development.
“I’m sure it is his personal wish to see this country achieve the objectives of Vision 2020 in good time,” she said.
“And if Tun goes on like this, it will hamper this process.
“If Tun really loves the country and really wants to see the national agenda, the agenda of the Malays and the agenda of the multi-racial society of Malaysia realised in 2020, then he should help us,” she said.
She made the plea after opening Infineon Technologies (Kulim) Sdn Bhd at Kulim Hi-Tech Park here yesterday.
The International Trade and Industry Minister said it would be better for Dr Mahathir to work with the Government and help it achieve Vision 2020.
“The less he talks the better, because some of (his allegations) are going to open a lot of unnecessary things which might even go back to his time (as prime minister),” she said.
Another curry favor : Dr M’s allegation is insulting, says Nazri
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad insulted and questioned the integrity of Kubang Pasu Umno members when he claimed they had accepted bribes in order not to elect him as a delegate to the party’s general assembly.
Umno supreme council member Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz said he doubted the division members, who held their meeting last Saturday, would “stoop so low as to accept a RM200 bribe just to ensure Dr Mahathir would not get elected.”
He was confident that Kubang Pasu Umno division members had made their decision according to their own wishes and were not dictated to or pressured by others.
“This allegation is an insult to Kubang Pasu Umno members. I don’t think it’s right. If it is true, then make a report,” he said after closing a national level pre-university oratory contest organised by the Anti-Corruption Agency yesterday.
Nazri said Dr Mahathir should just accept the fact that he had lost in his bid to become a delegate.
Kubang Pasu Umno division chief Datuk Johari Baharom said members would not simply vote out Dr Mahathir for RM200.
“It’s the first time I’ve heard about money being distributed,” said Johari, who was asked to comment on Dr Mahathir’s claim.
“We are not that 'cheap' to accept such an amount, if anything Dr Mahathir said is to be believed. However, I’m happy that Dr Mahathir has accepted his defeat.
“My division and I will always support him. He’s been with it for more than 30 years,” said Johari.
Umno Youth chief Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein said Dr Mahathir should lodge a complaint with the party’s disciplinary committee.
He also added that if money politics had actually taken place in the Kubang Pasu division, Dr Mahathir’s son Mukhriz would not have been selected as a delegate.
**********
Rakyat mula meratib kegagalan dan kelemahan Abdullah Ahmad Badawi
Sekumpulan penggerak internet yang menggelarkan diri mereka sebagai kickdefella.blogspot.com dan dan undurlah.blogspot.com menyelar Perdana Menteri dan Presiden Umno, Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi dan menyifatkan beliau sebagai pemimpin yang gagal.
Dalam laporan yang disiarkan menerusi laman umno-reform.com kumpulan tersebut menyenaraikan beberapa insiden termasuk janji-janji yang tidak dapat ditunaikan selepas Abdullah mengambil alih kepimpinan negara dan parti daripada Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.
Sebelum ini Mahathir secara mendakwa Abdullah membawa kepimpinan kerajaan dan parti ke arah diktator kerana menghalangnya bercakap kepada ahli Umno dan mengarahkan ahli Majlis Tertinggi termasuk Menteri menghentamnya secara terbuka.
Malah bekas PM itu turut digelar iblis dan beruk serta pemecahbelah parti kerana terus mengkritik peribadi dan kepimpinan Abdullah.
Sehingga dalam sidang akhbarnya Isnin lalu, Mahathir secara terbuka mengesa Abdullah meletakkan jawatan dan mendakwa pengantinya itu mempunyai sifat 'habit of lying'.
Antara kegagalan dan kelemahan Abdullah yang disenaraikan oleh sekumpulan penggerak internet antaranya adalah:-
1. Beliau telah gagal mengotakan janjinya yang dibuat di dalam manifesto pilihanraya 2004.
2. Beliau telah gagal mengotakan janjinya yang dibuat setelah di lantik selaku Perdana Menteri untuk membersihkan Malaysia dari gejala rasuah.
3. Beliau telah gagal menjalankan usul Suruhanjaya DiRaja berhubung penubuhan IPCMC.
4. Beliau telah gagal mempertahankan maruah negara Malaysia di dalam hubungan diplomatik.
5. Beliau telah gagal mempertahankan kedaulatan Malaysia di dalam perjanjian-perjanjian perdagangan dua hala.
6. Beliau telah gagal mempertahankan nama baik Y.Bhg Tun Dr. Mahathir, seorang negarawan ulung yang telah begitu besar jasanya kepada negara daripada di keji dan dihina.
7. Beliau telah gagal mengambil tindakan terhadap menantunya yang mengusulkan bahawa Y.Bhg Tun Dr. Mahathir adalah Beruk.
8. Beliau telah gagal mengambil tindakan terhadap menteri-menteri kabinet beliau yang bersikap kurang ajar terhadap Y. Bhg. Tun Dr. Mahathir.
9. Beliau sendiri telah menghina Y.Bhg. Tun Dr. Mahathir dengan mengusulkan bahawa Tun Dr. Mahathir ibarat Iblis.
10. Beliau telah gagal menjamin kebebasan bersuara yang diperuntukan oleh perlembagaan mengakibatkan Tun Dr. Mahathir merasakan dirinya lebih hina dari mana-mana pacar Tuanku (Raja) yang terhina.
11. Beliau telah secara terbuka menipu rakyat Malaysia dengan membuat kenyataan-kenyataan yang bercanggah dengan kebenaran hakiki.
12. Beliau telah menipu rakyat Malaysia dengan tujuan mempertahankan anaknya sendiri.
**********
A Malaysian “Mexican Stand-Off”
Malaysian-born Bakri Musa wrote :
The present tiff between former Prime Minister Tun Mahathir and his successor could have only three possible outcomes. One or the other could prevail, or the controversy could result in what we in California would call a “Mexican standoff.” This third ending is unlikely considering the personalities of the protagonists. Nonetheless it would be illuminating to speculate what would be the possible consequences of each ending.
Mahathir’s Victory
Consider first if Mahathir were to prevail. The direct impact would be felt not only by Abdullah but also his ministers and senior UMNO leaders, especially those like Rafidah Aziz, Najib Razak, and Nazri Aziz who owe their rise to Mahathir but who are now consumed with vilifying the man in their own uniquely vulgar style. Rafidah especially, for she was the matron, the so-called “iron lady,” who cried uncontrobaly on stage when Mahathir unexpectedly announced his resignation not too long ago.
The consequence to Abdullah would be obvious. He would be an ineffective “lame duck” leader. Many would argue that would make him no different than what he is already now. Well, even the lame could be mortally wounded, and Mahathir’s victory would do that to Abdullah. He would be out, whether voluntarily or through open challenge. Either way it would not be pretty.
UMNO is a big party with a long and distinguished tradition, its recent soiling with money politics and crony capitalism notwithstanding. The fate of any individual regardless of how important never meant much to the party. UMNO successfully withstood the abrupt resignation of its founder leader Datuk Onn and the forced withdrawal of Tunku and Hussein Onn as Prime Ministers and thus UMNO leaders. In the 1980s, it held up to the combined assault of its former leaders Hussein, Tunku, and Tengku Razaleigh. Hussein and Tunku died without ever returning to the fold; Razaleigh saw the wisdom of repenting.
If UMNO could withstand the downfall of those giants, it could easily brush off the stumbling of a dwarf.
Under normal circumstances, if Abdullah were to lose, those ministers who currently are his fervent supporters through their vociferous vilifying of Mahathir would also have to leave. This however, is Malaysia, and those ministers have not exactly demonstrated any class act; hence their chances of doing so would be nil. Watch instead for them to grovel themselves anew to his successor in order to retain their positions. They would, without skipping a beat, be demonizing Abdullah, just as they did to Mahathir. Such are their true being.
If Abdullah’s successor were to retain these characters, it would be a clear indication that he or she lacks something between the ears, much less political sense.
Mahathir Not Prevailing
Mahathir’s not prevailing does not mean an automatic victory for Abdullah. A strong leader becomes stronger upon surviving a challenge; a weak leader continues to be so, and become even more vulnerable. Abdullah would be battered, and a battered lame leader is an easy prey for other would-be leaders, ambitious or otherwise. The world of politics is no different from the world of animals.
Even if Abdullah were to perceive his bout with Mahathir as a momentous victory, that would not necessarily invigorate Abdullah. He would continue to be asleep at meetings, defer tough decisions, and continually plead, “I do not know!”
That sucking hissing sound emanating from Abdullah is not an expression of victory or satisfaction, but a giant sigh of relief at having survived a close call.
As for Mahathir, nothing would have changed for him. Contrary to the “touching” concerns about his dignity by the likes of Rafidah, the Tun would continue conducting himself as he always has, by being direct and frontal. He would become an even more trenchant critic of the Abdullah Administration. He would stay put as advisor to Proton and Petronas, daring Abdullah to remove him.
The media, local and foreign, would continue to attend his press conferences not because he is controversial but because he has something sensible to say and able to articulate it well. Not being elected a delegate would not faze him; UMNO had treated him worse before.
Yes, Mahathir is now much older, but the God Lord has been kind to him; he looks fit. Put Mahathir and Abdullah side by side, and a foreigner would have a hard time telling who succeeded whom!
It is not for the likes of Nazri, Rafidah and other water boys and girls to ascertain Mahathir’s legacy; that is for historians. There will be plenty of time for that.
Abdullah is not without his stubborn streak. If he persists, he risks distracting the nation, and at a time when it could least afford it, what with the Ninth Malaysia Plan barely rolling off.
If Abdullah were to expose his vindictive side and do an “Anwar” on Mahathir on a scale much uglier than the earlier pepper spray episode in Kota Baru, as for example by using the Internal Security Act, that could easily backfire. Besides how would that square with the “Mr. Nice Guy” image he is carefully cultivating, not to mention the Islam Hadhari spirit.
No Joy for Non-Malays (and Malays)
Contrary to the chauvinistic chanting of opportunistic leaders in UMNO ready to exploit any crisis to their own political advantage, there is no particular joy for non-Malays (or even Malays for that matter) to this internal leadership imbroglio. Far from giving non-Malays and the opposition an opportunity to manipulate, as proclaimed by the still green Deputy UMNO Youth leader, they have much to lose with this destructive distraction. Investors local and foreign would not take kindly to any perceived leadership uncertainty. A “Mexican standoff” would do that.
Such insulting assumptions younger UMNO leaders have of their non-Malay fellow citizens reflect the shallowness of their thinking, which in turn is indicative of their thin intellect, despite their having attended august learning institutions.
Resolving this crisis between Mahathir and Abdullah does not mean a simplistic “kiss and make up” meeting between the two, as many UMNO simpletons are urging them to do. It would require addressing the fundamental question of leadership, or lack of one, on the part of Abdullah.
For Abdullah, the central question is (to rephrase Reagan’s famous campaign spiel): Are Malaysians better off under his administration then they were under Mahathir’s. Abdullah has yet to address, let alone answer that plaintive query.
Malaysia Ahmad Badawi Mahathir Khairy MCA UMNO Rafidah Aziz Nazri Aziz
posted by Ah Yun Wong at
6:35 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home